Texas Proposition 7, Creation of State Energy Fund Amendment (2023)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Texas Proposition 7
Flag of Texas.png
Election date
November 7, 2023
Topic
Energy and Utilities
Status
Approveda Approved
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature

Texas Proposition 7, the Creation of State Energy Fund Amendment, was on the ballot in Texas as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 7, 2023.[1][2]The ballot measure was approved.

A "yes" vote supported creating the Texas Energy Fund to be administered by the Public Utilities Commission and authorizing the state legislature to allocate funds for the modernization of electric generating facilities.

A "no" vote opposed creating the Texas Energy Fund to be administered by the Public Utilities Commission and authorizing the state legislature to allocate funds for the modernization of electric generating facilities.


Election results

Texas Proposition 7

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

1,644,279 64.92%
No 888,410 35.08%
Results are officially certified.
Source

Overview

What did the amendment do?

See also: Text of measure

The amendment established the Texas Energy Fund in the Texas Constitution to fund the construction, maintenance, modernization, and operation of electric generating facilities. The fund is administered by the Public Utility Commission (PUC) of Texas, which is authorized to provide loans and grants to advance the purposes of the fund. The amendment requires that the PUC allocates money to eligible projects in each region of Texas that contain an electric power grid in proportion to that region's load share.[2]

Money in the fund consists of money appropriated by the state legislature; investment returns from the fund; and gifts, grants, and donations contributed to the fund. The expenses of managing the fund will be paid by the fund. Money appropriated by the state legislature will be excluded from the state's appropriation limit.[2]

The Texas State Legislature also passed Senate Bill 2627, the implementing legislation, during the 2023 legislative session. It took effect when the amendment passed. SB 2627 established an advisory committee for the fund. It also detailed the types of projects that could be funded by the Texas Energy Fund.[3]

Who supported and opposed this amendment?

See also: Support and Opposition

ConocoPhillips, Koch Companies, BASF Corporation Employees PAC, Texas Association of Manufacturers, Texas Oil and Gas Association, Texas Pipeline Association, and Valero Energy Corporation PAC registered in support of the amendment. State Sen. Charles Schwertner (R-5), who sponsored the amendment, said, "Winter Storm Uri revealed the failures in our electricity market, specifically the lack of reliability. ... S.B. 2627 creates a completion bonus and zero-interest loan for new dispatchable generation resources directly targeted at 'steel in the ground.' It also provides low-interest loans for existing dispatchable generators as a mechanism for generators to access capital needed to maintain and make necessary improvements to existing generation resources."[4]

Oneok, Inc., Environment Texas, Texas Advanced Energy Business Alliance, and Texas Consumer Association registered in opposition to the amendment. Environment Texas Executive Director Luke Metzger said, "We need, and Texans want, more clean energy, not less. There is strong support for more wind and solar energy, more battery storage, more energy efficiency, and more interconnection with the national grid. Unfortunately, the Legislature ignored these solutions to strengthen our electric grid while protecting consumers and the environment."[5]

Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title was as follows:[2]

The constitutional amendment providing for the creation of the Texas energy fund to support the construction, maintenance, modernization, and operation of electric generating facilities.[6]

Constitutional changes

See also: Article 3, Texas Constitution

The measure amended section 49 of Article 3 of the state constitution. The following underlined text was added:[2] Note: Use your mouse to scroll over the below text to see the full text.

Sec. 49-q. (a) The Texas energy fund is created as a special fund in the state treasury outside the general revenue fund. (b) As provided by general law, money in the Texas energy fund may be administered and used, without further appropriation, only by the Public Utility Commission of Texas or that commission’s successor in function to provide loans and grants to any entity to finance or incentivize the construction, maintenance, modernization, and operation of electric generating facilities, including associated infrastructure, necessary to ensure the reliability or adequacy of an electric power grid in this state. The commission shall allocate money from the fund for loans and grants to eligible projects:

(1) for electric generating facilities that serve as backup power sources; and
(2) in each region of the state that is part of an electric power grid in proportion to that region’s load share.

(c) The entity administering the Texas energy fund may establish separate accounts in the fund as necessary or convenient for the fund’s administration. (d) The Texas energy fund consists of:

(1) money credited, appropriated, or transferred to the fund by or as authorized by the legislature;
(2) revenue that the legislature dedicates for deposit to the credit of the fund;
(3) the returns received from the investment of the money in the fund; and
(4) gifts, grants, and donations contributed to the credit of the fund.

(e) The reasonable expenses of managing the Texas energy fund’s assets shall be paid from the fund. (f) The legislature by a provision of a general appropriations act may provide for the transfer to the general revenue fund of money that is subject to this section. (g) The legislature may appropriate general revenue for the purpose of depositing money to the credit of the Texas energy fund to be used for the purposes of that fund. (h) For purposes of Section 22, Article VIII, of this constitution:

(1)money in the Texas energy fund is dedicated by this constitution; and
(2) an appropriation of state tax revenues for the purpose of depositing money to the credit of the Texas energy fund is treated as if it were an appropriation of revenues dedicated by this constitution.[6]

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2023

Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The state legislature wrote the ballot language for this measure.

The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 21, and the FRE is -15. The word count for the ballot title is 24.


Support

Texas Infrastructure Coalition led the campaign in support of Proposition 7.[7]

Supporters

Corporations

  • ConocoPhillips Alaska
  • Koch Companies

Organizations

  • BASF Corporation Employees Political Action Committee
  • North Texas Commission
  • Texans for Fiscal Responsibility
  • Texas Association of Manufacturers
  • Texas Oil and Gas Association
  • Texas Pipeline Association
  • Texas Realtors
  • Valero Energy Corporation Political Action Committee

Arguments

  • State Sen. Charles Schwertner (R-5): "Winter Storm Uri revealed the failures in our electricity market, specifically the lack of reliability. ... S.B. 2627 creates a completion bonus and zero-interest loan for new dispatchable generation resources directly targeted at 'steel in the ground.' It also provides low-interest loans for existing dispatchable generators as a mechanism for generators to access capital needed to maintain and make necessary improvements to existing generation resources."
  • Tony Bennett, president and chief executive officer of the Texas Association of Manufacturers: "In addition to bolstering reliability, increasing the supply of generation will help keep prices in check for all consumers by reducing the frequency of expensive power shortage events."


Opposition

Opponents

Corporations

  • Oneok, Inc.

Organizations

  • Environment Texas
  • Huffines Liberty Foundation
  • Sierra Club
  • Texas Advanced Energy Business Alliance
  • Texas Consumer Association
  • Texas Eagle Forum
  • True Texas Project

Arguments

  • Environment Texas Executive Director Luke Metzger: "We need, and Texans want, more clean energy, not less. There is strong support for more wind and solar energy, more battery storage, more energy efficiency, and more interconnection with the national grid. Unfortunately, the Legislature ignored these solutions to strengthen our electric grid while protecting consumers and the environment."
  • Texas Consumer Association President Sandie Haverlah: "The problems with Proposition 7 have been recognized by a number of groups across the political spectrum. Remarkably, this scheme has resulted in a rare case of Texans from both sides of the aisle coming together in opposition. Texans believe in a hand up, not a handout. Proposition 7 is nothing more than a handout that our children and grandchildren will be paying for and should be voted down."


Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Texas ballot measures

If you are aware of a committee registered to support or oppose this amendment, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Media editorials

See also: 2023 ballot measure media endorsements

Ballotpedia lists the positions of media editorial boards that support or oppose ballot measures. This does not include opinion pieces from individuals or groups that do not represent the official position of a newspaper or media outlet. Ballotpedia includes editorials from newspapers and outlets based on circulation and readership, political coverage within a state, and length of publication. You can share media editorial board endorsements with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Support

  • Houston Chronicle Editorial Board: "Proposition 7 would create the Texas Energy Fund to subsidize low-interest loans for the 'construction, maintenance, modernization and operation' of new power plants. ... Proposition 7 is hardly perfect, but as a sum of its parts it could be an effective bridge solution for keeping our lights on and ACs running. We urge a 'for' vote on Proposition 7."
  • The Dallas Morning News Editorial Board: "RECOMMENDATION: Yes. The deadly power outages caused by the February 2021 winter storm made many Texans aware of the unreliability of the state’s electric grid. A record-setting heat wave which broke demand records 10 times this summer added worry."
  • Fort Worth Star-Telegram Editorial Board: "Another ongoing fund, this time $5 billion to finance electricity development, would be created. The state needs more energy capacity fueled by natural gas. Ideally, the market would account for it. But we can’t risk another grid shutdown. Recommendation: For."

Opposition

  • San Antonio Express-News Editorial Board: "Proposition 7: This would create a Texas energy fund to support the construction, maintenance, modernization and operation of electric generating facilities. The Legislature would allocate $5 billion to create the fund, which would distribute 3% interest loans and grants to companies to build natural gas-fueled power plants on the state’s main electric grid. Texas' energy needs are clear, but excluding renewable energy sources, so instrumental in keeping the lights on this summer, is frustrating and myopic. Our view: Against."
  • The Austin Chronicle Editorial Board: "Incentives for New Gas Plants: No. Though the ballot language is vague enough to seem positive, Prop 7 would actually just give low-interest loans and grants to encourage the construction of new gas plants – benefits that they already get from the private market – and literally stipulates that new battery construction projects need not apply. Yes, we need more energy sources, but this would essentially create a taxpayer-backed subsidy for gas plants alone, creating an unfair disadvantage for renewables and their backups."
  • Austin American-Statesman Editorial Board: "With this amendment, the state shows its hand that it is wiling to help one player only — natural gas-powered electric plants, which can harm the environment and be more expensive to operate than cleaner solutions. If natural gas-powered plants are needed, they should be able to get their own financing to build. Vote 'No.'"


Background

Senate Bill 2627 (2023)

The Texas State Legislature passed Senate Bill 2627 (SB 2627) during the 2023 regular legislative session by a vote of 30-1 in the Senate and 114-20 in the House. SB 2627 provided that the Texas Energy Fund is a special state treasury fund administered by the Public Utility Commission (PUC). The PUC was authorized to provide grants to fund transmission and distribution infrastructure and electrical generating facilities in the areas outside of the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) power region, which encompassed about 75% of the state. SB 2627 prohibited grant funds from being used to comply with weatherization standards adopted before December 1, 2023, or debt payments.[8]

The PUC was authorized to provide loans to finance:[8]

  • upgrades to existing dispatchable electric generating facilities that provide power to the ERCOT power region that results in a net increase of at least 100 megawatts of capacity per facility and
  • construction of new facilities in the ERCOT power region that each have a generation capacity of at least 100 megawatts.

Under the bill, the criteria for evaluating loan applicants included:[8]

  • quality of services and management;
  • efficiency and history of operations;
  • resource operation attributes;
  • ability to address regional and reliability needs;
  • access to essential resources for operating the facility;
  • creditworthiness and ability to repay the loan;
  • the cost of the project and impact of the generation facility; and
  • any other factors PUC finds appropriate.

The loans have a 20-year term and an interest rate of 3%. Since the amendment was approved,, PUC was required to begin accepting applications by June 1, 2024.[8]

Texas Public Utility Commission

See also: Texas Public Utility Commission

The Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUCT) is a state executive agency in the Texas state government. The commission is in charge of regulating electric and telecommunications utilities in Texas. Its stated mission is to "protect customers, foster competition, and promote high-quality infrastructure."[9]

It is composed of five commissioners. The five commissioners are appointed by the governor to six-year, staggered terms. The governor appoints the presiding officer (chair) from the five-member commission to serve at the pleasure of the governor. The budget for the Texas Public Utilities Commission in Fiscal Year 2022 was $19,096,390.[10]

Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT)

ERCOT map.jpeg

The Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) is a nonprofit corporation that manages electric power for most of Texas. As of 2023, it managed electric power for approximately 26 million Texas residents and represented approximately 90% of Texas' electric power. The members of ERCOT include consumers, cooperatives, generators, power marketers, retail electric providers, investor-owned electric utilities, transmission and distribution providers, and municipally owned electric utilities. The Public Utility Commission of Texas and the Texas Legislature have regulatory authority over ERCOT. The map to the left shows the counties in the ERCOT power region.[11]

Winter Storm Uri (2021)

A Category 3 major winter storm, referred to as Winter Storm Uri, formed on February 11, 2021, over Texas. Gov. Greg Abbott (R) issued a state of emergency for all 254 Texas counties due to the storm on February 12. On February 13, some electric generating facilities began experiencing outages, and on February 14, ERCOT issued a public statement asking customers to reduce energy usage because power generation could not be increased to meet demand. ERCOT implemented controlled blackouts, and the grid normalized by February 19. The University of Houston reported that the percentage of Texans without electricity during February 14-20 was 69%.[12]

Referred measures on the Texas ballot

See also: List of Texas ballot measures

In Texas, a total of 281 ballot measures appeared on statewide ballots between 1985 and 2022. Two hundred forty-eight ballot measures were approved, and 33 ballot measures were defeated.

Texas statewide ballot measures, 1985-2022
Total number Annual average Annual minimum Annual maximum Approved Defeated
# % # %
281
6.39
0
22
248
88.26
33
11.74

Texas ballot measures in odd-numbered years

Between 1995 and 2021, Texans decided on 175 statewide ballot measures appearing on odd-numbered year ballots. Voters approved 160 measures and defeated 15.


Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Texas Constitution

To put a legislatively referred constitutional amendment before voters, a two-thirds (66.67%) vote is required in both the Texas State Senate and the Texas House of Representatives.

This amendment was introduced as Senate Joint Resolution 93 on May 1, 2023. On May 4, 2023, the state Senate passed SJR 93 by a vote of 27-4. The state House passed an amended version of SJR 93 on May 22 by a vote of 103-35 with 11 not voting or absent. The Senate passed the amended version on May 28 by a vote of 27-4.[1]

Vote in the Texas House of Representatives
May 22, 2023
Requirement: Two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 100  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total1033511
Total percent69.1%23.5%7.4%
Democrat27307
Republican7654

Vote in the Texas State Senate
May 28, 2023
Requirement: Two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 21  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total2740
Total percent87.1%12.9%0.0%
Democrat930
Republican1810

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Texas

Click "Show" to learn more about voter registration, identification requirements, and poll times in Texas.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Texas State Legislature, "SJR 93 Overview," accessed May 5, 2023
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Texas State Legislature, "SJR 93 Text," accessed May 5, 2023
  3. Texas State Legislature, "SB 2627," accessed June 8, 2023
  4. Texas State Legislature, "SJR 93 Analysis," accessed June 30, 2023
  5. Environment Texas, "Texas Legislature subsidizes gas power plants, avoids worst attacks on renewable energy," accessed June 30, 2023
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content
  7. Texas Infrastructure Coalition, "Home," accessed November 2, 2023
  8. 8.0 8.1 8.2 8.3 Texas State Legislature, "Senate Bill 2627," accessed June 16, 2023
  9. Texas Public Utilities Commission, "About the PUCT: Mission and History," accessed January 25, 2021
  10. Issuu, "The Book of the States 2021," accessed September 28, 2022
  11. ERCOT, "About," accessed June 16, 2023
  12. Texas Comptroller, "Winter Storm Uri 2021," October 2021
  13. VoteTexas.gov, "Who, What, Where, When, How," accessed February 27, 2023
  14. Texas Secretary of State, “Request for Voter Registration Applications,” accessed February 27, 2023
  15. Texas Secretary of State, “Voter Registration,” accessed February 27, 2023
  16. Texas Constitution and Statutes, “Election Code,” accessed February 23, 2023
  17. The Texas Tribune, “Texas officials flag tens of thousands of voters for citizenship checks,” January 25, 2019
  18. The New York Times, “Federal Judge Halts ‘Ham-Handed’ Texas Voter Purge,” February 28, 2019
  19. The New York Times, “Texas Ends Review That Questioned Citizenship of Almost 100,000 Voters,” April 26, 2019
  20. Texas Secretary of State, “Secretary Whitley Announces Settlement In Litigation On Voter Registration List Maintenance Activity,” April 26, 2019
  21. 21.0 21.1 21.2 21.3 21.4 Texas Secretary of State, "Required Identification for Voting in Person," accessed February 27, 2023 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "tvid" defined multiple times with different content