Texas Proposition 2, Property Tax Exemption for Child-Care Facilities Amendment (2023)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Texas Proposition 2, Property Tax Exemption for Child-Care Facilities Amendment
Flag of Texas.png
Election date
November 7, 2023
Topic
Taxes
Status
Approveda Approved
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature

Texas Proposition 2, the Property Tax Exemption for Child-Care Facilities Amendment, was on the ballot in Texas as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 7, 2023.[1][2]The ballot measure was approved.

A "yes" vote supported amending the state constitution to allow counties or municipalities to authorize a property tax exemption on all or part of the appraised value of real property used to operate child-care facilities.

A "no" vote opposed this constitutional amendment to authorize local property tax exemptions on properties used to operate child-care facilities.


Election results

Texas Proposition 2

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

1,629,151 64.78%
No 885,704 35.22%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Overview

What did Proposition 2 do?

See also: Text of measure

Proposition 2 authorized the state legislature to pass a law to authorize a property tax exemption on all or part of the property used to operate a child-care facility. It also authorized the state legislature to define child-care facility and imposed eligibility requirements for qualifying for the tax exemption.[2]

The state legislature also passed Senate Bill 1145 (SB 1145), the implementing legislation, during the 2023 regular legislative session.[3]

Who supported and opposed the amendment?

See also: Support and Opposition

The amendment was sponsored by State Sen. Royce West (D-23). Sen. West said, "The Texas child-care shortage is likely to have devastating effects on early childhood education, economic growth, and employment opportunities for parents. According to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation, Texas' economy loses more than $9 billion every year due to inadequate child care. S.J.R. 64 seeks to address this issue by allowing the legislature, by general law, to exempt from property taxation all or part of the appraised value of real property used to operate a child-care facility." The amendment also received endorsements from Methodist Healthcare Ministries and Texas Restaurant Association.[4]

Ballotpedia did not locate a campaign in opposition to the ballot measure.

Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title was as follows:[2]

The constitutional amendment authorizing a local option exemption from ad valorem taxation by a county or municipality of all or part of the appraised value of real property used to operate a child-care facility.[5]

Constitutional changes

See also: Article 8, Texas Constitution

The ballot measure added a Section 1-r to Article 8 of the Texas Constitution. The following underlined text was added:[2]

Section 1-r. The governing body of a county or municipality may exempt from ad valorem taxation all or part of the appraised value of real property used to operate a child-care facility. The governing body may adopt the exemption as a percentage of the appraised value of the real property. The percentage specified by the governing body may not be less than 50 percent. The legislature by general law may define "child-care facility" for purposes of this section and may provide additional eligibility requirements for the exemption authorized by this section.[5]

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2023

Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The state legislature wrote the ballot language for this measure.

The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 21, and the FRE is 7. The word count for the ballot title is 35.


Support

Supporters

Officials

Organizations

  • Methodist Healthcare Ministries
  • Texas Restaurant Association

Arguments

  • Kim Kofron, senior director of education for Children at Risk: "We have the child care cliff that we’re all experiencing with the money that ran out at the end of September. Prop 2 is not going to replace all those funds, and it’s not going to solve child care, but it’s a good start and way for providers to really feel some relief."
  • State Sen. Royce West (D-23): "The Texas child-care shortage is likely to have devastating effects on early childhood education, economic growth, and employment opportunities for parents. According to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Foundation, Texas' economy loses more than $9 billion every year due to inadequate child care. S.J.R. 64 seeks to address this issue by allowing the legislature, by general law, to exempt from property taxation all or part of the appraised value of real property used to operate a child-care facility."


Opposition

Opponents

Organizations

  • Huffines Liberty Foundation
  • Texans for Fiscal Responsibility
  • Texas Eagle Forum
  • True Texas Project

Arguments

  • Texans for Fiscal Responsibility: "We strongly recommend voting against this amendment. Carving out property tax exemptions for businesses always result in higher tax burdens for other businesses, especially homeowners, who must pay more in taxes to make up the difference in lost tax revenue."


Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Texas ballot measures

If you are aware of a committee registered to support or oppose this amendment, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Media editorials

See also: 2023 ballot measure media endorsements

Ballotpedia identified the following media editorial boards as taking positions on the proposition.

Ballotpedia lists the positions of media editorial boards that support or oppose ballot measures. This does not include opinion pieces from individuals or groups that do not represent the official position of a newspaper or media outlet. Ballotpedia includes editorials from newspapers and outlets based on circulation and readership, political coverage within a state, and length of publication. You can share media editorial board endorsements with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Support

  • Houston Chronicle Editorial Board: "Prop 2, Child care center tax cut: For. Child care deserts increased during the pandemic. We hope this property tax break, while imperfect, will trickle down to providers and families."
  • San Antonio Express-News Editorial Board: "Proposition 2: This proposition would allow city and county governments to create property tax exemptions for child care facilities. The hope is property tax relief would translate into reduced tuition, making child care more affordable. It also allows the Legislature to define a child care facility. Our view: For."
  • The Dallas Morning News Editorial Board: "RECOMMENDATION: Yes. Child care is essential to keep growing the workforce and economy of Texas, but it is an expensive and labor-intensive business. Providers struggle to pay their employees more than $12 an hour on average. Child care is expensive for parents too — the average family in Dallas County spends around $11,000 or 14.6% of their income on child care every year."
  • Fort Worth Star-Telegram Editorial Board: "Cities and counties could exempt significant parts of the property value of child-care facilities from taxation. Taxpayers should be weary of the mounting number of such targeted breaks — every dime exempted must be paid by someone else. But this would give communities an optional tool to tackle an increasing problem, the lack of adequate child care. Recommendation: For."
  • The Austin Chronicle Editorial Board: "Property Tax Exemption for Child Care Centers: Yes. Part of the reason younger generations are not having kids is because child care is too damn expensive. We should do everything we can to reduce that cost – allowing owners of child care centers to access tax exemptions for properties used to operate those facilities could help do that."
  • Austin American-Statesman Editorial Board: "As any working parent knows, having a trusted place to care for your children while you work is a necessity in today's economy, particularly in low- to moderate-income households that struggle to make ends meet. But the well-chronicled economics of day care centers are brutal. Easing their strain can result in more childcare centers, potentially lowering costs for parents, allowing them to keep working and contribute to the economy. Vote 'Yes.'"

Opposition

You can share campaign information or arguments, along with source links for this information, at editor@ballotpedia.org


Background

Senate Bill 1145 (2023)

The Texas State Legislature passed Senate Bill 1145 (SB 1145) during the 2023 regular legislative session by a vote of 25-6 in the Senate and 109-33 in the House. SB 1145 authorized counties and municipalities to enact a local option property tax exemption from ad valorem taxation on all or part of the appraised value of property used to operate a child-care facility. The law prohibited the exemption from being less than 50% of the appraised value. For properties leased to operators of child-care facilities, the law required the landlord to include with their exemption application an affidavit that certifies they have informed the operator of the child-care facility of the amount of the tax exemption and that rent charged will be decreased in proportion to the reduction of taxes either through a monthly or annual credit against the rent. The law also states that the exemption does not need to be claimed again once it is authorized unless the property changes ownership or the property no longer meets the qualifications for the exemption. The law took effect on January 1, 2024.[6]

Missouri Property Tax Exemption for Childcare Establishments Amendment (2024)

See also: Missouri Property Tax Exemption for Childcare Establishments Amendment (2024)

Missouri voters will also be deciding on an amendment in November 2024 to provide for property tax exemptions for child-care establishments. The exemptions were designed to apply to all or part of the property owned by an individual, a for-profit organization, or a nonprofit organization used primarily for child-care. It was referred to the ballot by the Missouri State Legislature.[7]

Referred measures on the Texas ballot

See also: List of Texas ballot measures

In Texas, a total of 281 ballot measures appeared on statewide ballots between 1985 and 2022. Two hundred forty-eight ballot measures were approved, and 33 ballot measures were defeated.

Texas statewide ballot measures, 1985-2022
Total number Annual average Annual minimum Annual maximum Approved Defeated
# % # %
281
6.39
0
22
248
88.26
33
11.74

Texas ballot measures in odd-numbered years

Between 1995 and 2021, Texans decided on 175 statewide ballot measures appearing on odd-numbered year ballots. Voters approved 160 measures and defeated 15.


Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Texas Constitution

To put a legislatively referred constitutional amendment before voters, a two-thirds (66.67%) vote is required in both the Texas State Senate and the Texas House of Representatives.

This amendment was introduced as Senate Joint Resolution 64 on March 9, 2023. On May 3, 2023, the state Senate passed SJR 64 by a vote of 25-6. On May 19, the state House passed SJR 64 by a vote of 114-31 with four not voting.[1]

Vote in the Texas State Senate
May 3, 2023
Requirement: Two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 21  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total2560
Total percent80.6%19.4%0.0%
Democrat1200
Republican1360

Vote in the Texas House of Representatives
May 19, 2023
Requirement: Two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 100  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total114314
Total percent76.5%20.8%2.7%
Democrat6211
Republican52303

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Texas

Click "Show" to learn more about voter registration, identification requirements, and poll times in Texas.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Texas State Legislature, "SJR 64 Overview," accessed May 4, 2023
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Texas State Legislature, "SJR 64 Text," accessed May 4, 2023 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "Text" defined multiple times with different content
  3. Texas State Legislature, "Senate Bill 1145," accessed June 15, 2023
  4. Texas State Legislature, "SJR 64 Analysis," accessed July 12, 2023
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content
  6. Texas State Legislature, "Senate Bill 1145," accessed June 16, 2023
  7. Missouri Senate, "SJR 26," accessed March 25, 2023
  8. VoteTexas.gov, "Who, What, Where, When, How," accessed February 27, 2023
  9. Texas Secretary of State, “Request for Voter Registration Applications,” accessed February 27, 2023
  10. Texas Secretary of State, “Voter Registration,” accessed February 27, 2023
  11. Texas Constitution and Statutes, “Election Code,” accessed February 23, 2023
  12. The Texas Tribune, “Texas officials flag tens of thousands of voters for citizenship checks,” January 25, 2019
  13. The New York Times, “Federal Judge Halts ‘Ham-Handed’ Texas Voter Purge,” February 28, 2019
  14. The New York Times, “Texas Ends Review That Questioned Citizenship of Almost 100,000 Voters,” April 26, 2019
  15. Texas Secretary of State, “Secretary Whitley Announces Settlement In Litigation On Voter Registration List Maintenance Activity,” April 26, 2019
  16. 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 Texas Secretary of State, "Required Identification for Voting in Person," accessed February 27, 2023 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "tvid" defined multiple times with different content