Texas Proposition 14, Creation of the Centennial Parks Conservation Fund Amendment (2023)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Texas Creation of the Centennial Parks Conservation Fund Amendment
Flag of Texas.png
Election date
November 7, 2023
Topic
Forests and parks
Status
Approveda Approved
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature

The Texas Creation of the Centennial Parks Conservation Fund Amendment was on the ballot in Texas as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 7, 2023.[1][2]The ballot measure was approved.

A "yes" vote supported amending the state constitution to create the Centennial Parks Conservation Fund—a trust fund for the creation and improvement of state parks.

A "no" vote opposed this amendment to create the Centennial Parks Conservation Fund.


Election results

Texas Proposition 14

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

1,928,021 76.52%
No 591,658 23.48%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Overview

What did the amendment do?

See also: Text of measure

The amendment created the Centennial Parks Conservation Fund as a trust fund outside of the state treasury. The fund consists of money appropriated, credited, or transferred by the legislature; gifts, grants, and donations received by the Parks and Wildlife Department; and investment earnings. Money appropriated by the state legislature is excluded from the state's appropriation limit. Money in the fund is to be used to create and improve state parks. Any expenses incurred by the fund are expensed from the fund.[1]

The state legislature also passed Senate Bill 1648 (SB 1648), the implementing legislation, during the 2023 regular legislative session. SB 1648 amended the Parks and Wildlife Code to authorize the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department to administer the proposed fund. SB 1648 authorized the Parks and Wildlife Department to request a disbursement from the fund to acquire property in Texas to create and improve state parks. The bill also prohibits money in the fund to be used for department salaries, employee benefits, costs associated with employee benefits or the administration of the department, or the maintenance and operation of state parks. It took effect on January 1, 2024.[3]

Who supported and opposed the amendment?

See also: Support and Opposition

Environment Texas, Sierra Club Lone Star Chapter, Texans for State Parks, Texas Foundation for Conservation, and Texas Travel Alliance registered in support of the amendment. Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement, "This historic legislation would create a new golden age for our state parks. 2023 marks the centennial of the Texas state parks system and we have a lot to celebrate. What a great birthday present to give all Texans for the state parks system’s 100th."[4]

Ballotpedia did not locate a campaign in opposition to the ballot measure.

Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title was as follows:[2]

The constitutional amendment providing for the creation of the centennial parks conservation fund to be used for the creation and improvement of state parks.[5]

Constitutional changes

See also: Article 3, Texas Constitution

The measure amended section 49 of Article 3 of the state constitution. The following underlined text was added:[2]

Sec. 49-e-1. (a) The centennial parks conservation fund is established as a trust fund outside the treasury. In accordance with general law, the fund may be used only for the creation and improvement of state parks.

(b) The centennial parks conservation fund consists of:
(1) money appropriated, credited, or transferred to the fund by the legislature;
(2) gifts, grants, and donations received by the Parks and Wildlife Department or the department’s successor in function for a purpose for which money in the fund may be used under this section; and
(3) investment earnings and interest earned on amounts credited to the fund.
(c) The legislature may appropriate money from the centennial parks conservation fund to the Parks and Wildlife Department or the department’s successor in function for the purposes prescribed for the fund by this section and general law.
(d) For purposes of Section 22, Article VIII, of this constitution:
(1) money in the centennial parks conservation fund is dedicated by this constitution; and
(2) an appropriation of state tax revenues for the purpose of depositing money to the credit of the fund is treated as if it were an appropriation of revenues dedicated by this constitution.
(e) The reasonable expenses of managing the fund and its assets shall be paid from the fund.[5]

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2023

Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The state legislature wrote the ballot language for this measure.

The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 14, and the FRE is 34. The word count for the ballot title is 24.


Support

Texas Coalition for State Parks PAC led the campaign in support of Proposition 14. To see a full list of coalition members, click here.[6]

Supporters

Organizations

  • Environment Texas
  • Sierra Club Lone Star Chapter
  • Texans for State Parks
  • Texas Foundation for Conservation
  • Texas Travel Alliance

Individuals

  • Kacey Musgraves - Musician

Arguments

  • Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas: "This historic legislation would create a new golden age for our state parks. 2023 marks the centennial of the Texas state parks system and we have a lot to celebrate. What a great birthday present to give all Texans for the state parks system’s 100th."
  • State Senator Tan Parker (R-12): "The Centennial Parks Conservation Fund would provide dependable, long-term funding for new park acquisition that will protect the unique natural and cultural treasures of Texas, creating the opportunity to ensure our state parks thrive for generations to come."


Opposition

Opponents

Organizations

  • Texans for Fiscal Responsibility
  • Texas Eagle Forum
  • True Texas Project

Arguments

  • Texans for Fiscal Responsibility: "While conservation of natural resources and areas is important, there are other ways than spending billions of taxpayer dollars to maintain or create new state parks."


Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Texas ballot measures
The campaign finance information on this page reflects the most recently scheduled reports processed by Ballotpedia, which covered through October 30, 2023. The deadline for the next scheduled reports is January 16, 2024.


Texas Coalition for State Parks PAC registered in support of Proposition 14. The committee reported $271,789.78 in contributions. If you are aware of a committee registered to oppose this amendment, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $268,000.00 $3,789.78 $271,789.78 $211,760.00 $215,549.78
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Support

The following table includes contribution and expenditure totals for the committee in support of Proposition 14.[7]

Committees in support of Proposition 14
Committee Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Texas Coalition for State Parks $268,000.00 $3,789.78 $271,789.78 $211,760.00 $215,549.78
Total $268,000.00 $3,789.78 $271,789.78 $211,760.00 $215,549.78

Donors

The following table shows the top donors to the committee registered in support of Proposition 14.[7]

Donor Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions
Rod Sanders $50,000.00 $0.00 $50,000.00
Arch Aplin $25,000.00 $0.00 $25,000.00
LMBI, L.P $25,000.00 $0.00 $25,000.00
Thomas and Debra Friedkin $25,000.00 $0.00 $25,000.00
Darwin Deason $20,000.00 $0.00 $20,000.00

Methodology

To read Ballotpedia's methodology for covering ballot measure campaign finance information, click here.

Media editorials

See also: 2023 ballot measure media endorsements

Ballotpedia identified the following media editorial boards as taking positions on the proposition.

Ballotpedia lists the positions of media editorial boards that support or oppose ballot measures. This does not include opinion pieces from individuals or groups that do not represent the official position of a newspaper or media outlet. Ballotpedia includes editorials from newspapers and outlets based on circulation and readership, political coverage within a state, and length of publication. You can share media editorial board endorsements with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Support

  • Houston Chronicle Editorial Board: "Prop 14, State parks fund: For. We don’t have enough state parks in this vast state to accommodate our growing population. This $1 billion fund would allow for much needed new acquisitions."
  • San Antonio Express-News Editorial Board: "Proposition 14: This would create the Texas Centennial Parks Conservation Fund to create and maintain state parks. The Texas Parks & Wildlife Department would administer this fund. Preserving open spaces so people can enjoy them is important to preserving the state’s cultural legacy and an appreciation of its history and natural landscape. Our view: For."
  • The Dallas Morning News Editorial Board: "RECOMMENDATION: Yes. Texas needs more open spaces. Less than 5% of Texas land is publicly owned, and just 0.37% is state parks. We rank 35th in the nation for state park acreage per capita. And every year, Texas loses nearly 250,000 acres to development."
  • Fort Worth Star-Telegram Editorial Board: "Texas would create a $1 billion fund to build or improve state parks. The debacle over Fairfield Lake State Park revealed an urgent need to plan for more preservation of nature and recreational space for a booming population. Recommendation: For."
  • The Austin Chronicle Editorial Board: "Historic Investment in State Parks: Yes. This $1 billion fund coming out of the surplus would support the Texas Parks & Wildlife Department in buying land to establish and develop new state parks, something sorely needed to conserve natural areas and to keep up with the demand of 10 million (and counting) Texans a year trying to access our current parks."
  • Austin American-Statesman Editorial Board: "Most land in the state is privately owned. Not only is it scarce, it's getting more expensive. Proposition 14 can be a game-changer for those who cherish the immense beauty and value of state parks and the safeguards they provide for our natural resources and for preserving cultural and historic sites. ... Vote 'Yes.'"

Opposition

You can share campaign information or arguments, along with source links for this information, at editor@ballotpedia.org


Background

Senate Bill 1648 (2023)

The state legislature also passed Senate Bill 1648 (SB 1648), the implementing legislation, during the 2023 regular legislative session. SB 1648 amends the Parks and Wildlife Code to authorize the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department to administer the proposed fund. SB 1648 authorizes the Parks and Wildlife Department to request a disbursement from the fund to acquire property in Texas to create and improve state parks. The bill also prohibits money in the fund to be used for department salaries, employee benefits, costs associated with employee benefits or the administration of the department, or the maintenance and operation of state parks. It took effect on January 1, 2024.[8]

Senate Bill 1648 passed in the Senate by a vote of 26-3 with two absent. It passed in the House by a vote of 127-15 with seven not voting or absent.[8]

The state legislature authorized $1 billion in House Bill 1, the state budget bill, for the 2024-2025 fiscal year for state park acquisitions.[9]

Texas Parks and Wildlife Department

In 1963, the State Parks Board and the Game and Fish Commission were merged to form the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. It consists of nine members appointed by the governor and approved by the Senate that serve staggered six-year terms. A chair of the commission is appointed by the governor from among the nine members. The agency has 13 internal divisions: Executive, Wildlife, Coastal Fisheries, Inland Fisheries, Law Enforcement, State Parks, Infrastructure, Legal, Financial Resources, Communications, Human Resources, Support Resources, and Information Technology.[10]

As of 2023, the Texas Parks & Wildlife Department oversees more than 640,000 acres of land including 89 state parks, historic sites, and natural areas.[11]

Texas Proposition 5 (1967)

In 1967, Texans approved Proposition 5, which created the Texas Park Development Fund to acquire lands for state park sites and to develop state parks. The measure also authorized the issuance of $75 million in bonds for the fund. In March 2020, the Texas Public Finance Authority (TPFA) closed the fund and redirected any remaining funds to the Texas Parks Development Bonds Interest and Sinking Fund, which is administered by the state Parks and Wildlife Department.[12]

Referred measures on the Texas ballot

See also: List of Texas ballot measures

In Texas, a total of 281 ballot measures appeared on statewide ballots between 1985 and 2022. Two hundred forty-eight ballot measures were approved, and 33 ballot measures were defeated.

Texas statewide ballot measures, 1985-2022
Total number Annual average Annual minimum Annual maximum Approved Defeated
# % # %
281
6.39
0
22
248
88.26
33
11.74

Texas ballot measures in odd-numbered years

Between 1995 and 2021, Texans decided on 175 statewide ballot measures appearing on odd-numbered year ballots. Voters approved 160 measures and defeated 15.


Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Texas Constitution

To put a legislatively referred constitutional amendment before voters, a two-thirds (66.67%) vote is required in both the Texas State Senate and the Texas House of Representatives.

This amendment was introduced as Senate Joint Resolution 74 on March 6, 2023. On April 20, 2023, the state Senate passed SJR 74 by a vote of 26-3 with two absent. On May 15, the state House passed an amended version of SJR 74 by a vote of 123-21 with five not voting. On May 21, the state Senate adopted the amended version by a vote of 28-3.[1]

Vote in the Texas House of Representatives
May 15, 2023
Requirement: Two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 100  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total123215
Total percent82.6%14.1%3.4%
Democrat6103
Republican62212

Vote in the Texas State Senate
May 21, 2023
Requirement: Two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 21  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total2830
Total percent90.3%9.7%0.0%
Democrat1200
Republican1630

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Texas

Click "Show" to learn more about voter registration, identification requirements, and poll times in Texas.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Texas State Legislature, "SJR 74 Overview," accessed April 21, 2023
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Texas State Legislature, "SJR 74 Text," accessed April 21, 2023
  3. Texas State Legislature, "Senate Bill 1648 Overview," accessed June 5, 2023
  4. Environment Texas, "Texas House votes to create new state parks," accessed June 27, 2023
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content
  6. Grow Texas Parks, "What is Prop. 14?" accessed September 5, 2023
  7. 7.0 7.1 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named finance
  8. 8.0 8.1 Texas State Legislature, "Senate Bill 1648 Overview," accessed June 5, 2023
  9. Texas State Legislature, "House Bill 1," accessed June 5, 2023
  10. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, "History," accessed June 5, 2023
  11. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, "Commission," accessed June 5, 2023
  12. Texas Comptroller Manual of Accounts, "Appropriated Fund 0408 – Texas Parks Development Fund," accessed June 27, 2023
  13. VoteTexas.gov, "Who, What, Where, When, How," accessed February 27, 2023
  14. Texas Secretary of State, “Request for Voter Registration Applications,” accessed February 27, 2023
  15. Texas Secretary of State, “Voter Registration,” accessed February 27, 2023
  16. Texas Constitution and Statutes, “Election Code,” accessed February 23, 2023
  17. The Texas Tribune, “Texas officials flag tens of thousands of voters for citizenship checks,” January 25, 2019
  18. The New York Times, “Federal Judge Halts ‘Ham-Handed’ Texas Voter Purge,” February 28, 2019
  19. The New York Times, “Texas Ends Review That Questioned Citizenship of Almost 100,000 Voters,” April 26, 2019
  20. Texas Secretary of State, “Secretary Whitley Announces Settlement In Litigation On Voter Registration List Maintenance Activity,” April 26, 2019
  21. 21.0 21.1 21.2 21.3 21.4 Texas Secretary of State, "Required Identification for Voting in Person," accessed February 27, 2023 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "tvid" defined multiple times with different content