Texas Proposition 11, Authorize Bond Issues in Conservation and Reclamation Districts in El Paso County Amendment (2023)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Texas Proposition 11
Flag of Texas.png
Election date
November 7, 2023
Topic
County and municipal governance
Status
Approveda Approved
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature

Texas Proposition 11, the Authorize Bond Issues in Conservation and Reclamation Districts in El Paso County Amendment, was on the ballot in Texas as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 7, 2023.[1][2]The ballot measure was approved.

A "yes" vote supported amending the state constitution to authorize the state legislature to permit conservation and reclamation districts in El Paso County to issue bonds to fund parks and recreational facilities.

A "no" vote opposed this constitutional amendment, thereby maintaining that conservation and reclamation districts in El Paso County cannot issue bonds.


Election results

Texas Proposition 11

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

1,526,830 63.35%
No 883,339 36.65%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Overview

What did the amendment change about conservation and reclamation districts in El Paso County?

See also: Text of measure

The measure amended section 59 of Article 16 of the Texas Constitution to authorize the state legislature to permit conservation and reclamation districts in El Paso County to issue bonds to fund parks and recreational facilities and levy property taxes to repay the bonds. Conservation and reclamation districts are "governmental agencies and bodies politic and corporate with such powers of government and with the authority to exercise such rights, privileges and functions concerning" the conservation and development of the state's natural resources. Districts have elected boards that govern its functioning.[3]

Which counties were authorized to issue bonds in conservation and reclamation districts?

At the time of the election, the state constitution authorized conservation and reclamation districts in Bexar, Bastrop, Waller, Travis, Williamson, Harris, Galveston, Brazoria, Fort Bend, Montgomery Counties, and Tarrant Regional Water District to issue bonds repaid by property taxes. The section of the constitution that was amended was added in 2003 with the approval of Proposition 4. It authorized the existing list of counties to issue debt for projects in conservation and reclamation districts. It was approved with 56.4% of the vote.

In 2011, the state legislature referred a similar measure as the 2023 amendment that would have authorized El Paso County to permit conservation and reclamation districts to issue bonds and levy taxes for the development and maintenance of parks and recreational facilities. It was defeated by a margin of 51.7% to 48.3%.

Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title was as follows:[2]

The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to permit conservation and reclamation districts in El Paso County to issue bonds supported by ad valorem taxes to fund the development and maintenance of parks and recreational facilities.[4]

Constitutional changes

See also: Article 16, Texas Constitution

The measure amended section 59 of Article 16 of the state constitution. The following underlined text was added, and struck-through text was deleted:[2]

Note: Use your mouse to scroll over the below text to see the full text.

(c-1) In addition and only as provided by this subsection, the Legislature may authorize conservation and reclamation districts to develop and finance with taxes those types and categories of parks and recreational facilities that were not authorized by this section to be developed and financed with taxes before September 13, 2003. For development of such parks and recreational facilities, the Legislature may authorize indebtedness payable from taxes as may be necessary to provide for improvements and maintenance only for a conservation and reclamation district all or part of which is located in Bexar County, Bastrop County, Waller County, Travis County, Williamson County, Harris County, Galveston County, Brazoria County, Fort Bend County, or Montgomery County, or El Paso County, or for the Tarrant Regional Water District, a water control and improvement district located in whole or in part in Tarrant County. All the indebtedness may be evidenced by bonds of the conservation and reclamation district, to be issued under regulations as may be prescribed by law. The Legislature may also authorize the levy and collection within such district of all taxes, equitably distributed, as may be necessary for the payment of the interest and the creation of a sinking fund for the payment of the bonds and for maintenance of and improvements to such parks and recreational facilities. The indebtedness shall be a lien on the property assessed for the payment of the bonds. The Legislature may not authorize the issuance of bonds or provide for indebtedness under this subsection against a conservation and reclamation district unless a proposition is first submitted to the qualified voters of the district and the proposition is adopted. This subsection expands the authority of the Legislature with respect to certain conservation and reclamation districts and is not a limitation on the authority of the Legislature with respect to conservation and reclamation districts and parks and recreational facilities pursuant to this section as that authority existed before September 13, 2003.[4]

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2023

Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The state legislature wrote the ballot language for this measure.

The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 23, and the FRE is -8. The word count for the ballot title is 35.


Support

Supporters

Officials

Corporations

  • El Paso Water

Arguments

You can share campaign information or arguments, along with source links for this information, at editor@ballotpedia.org


Opposition

Opponents

Organizations

  • Texas Eagle Forum
  • True Texas Project

Arguments

  • True Texas Project: "We generally oppose all bonds, and this amendment would provide additional capacity for El Paso County to increase taxes to fund parks and recreation facilities with new bonds."

Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Texas ballot measures

If you are aware of a committee registered to support or oppose this amendment, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Media editorials

See also: 2023 ballot measure media endorsements

Ballotpedia identified the following media editorial boards as taking positions on the proposition.

Ballotpedia lists the positions of media editorial boards that support or oppose ballot measures. This does not include opinion pieces from individuals or groups that do not represent the official position of a newspaper or media outlet. Ballotpedia includes editorials from newspapers and outlets based on circulation and readership, political coverage within a state, and length of publication. You can share media editorial board endorsements with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Support

  • Houston Chronicle Editorial Board: "Prop 11, El Paso conservation: For. We see no reason why El Paso shouldn’t have the same tools as Harris, Fort Bend, Travis County and others to manage public resources such as water. This bond authority is one of those tools."
  • San Antonio Express-News Editorial Board: "Proposition 11: El Paso County was not among the 11 counties (including Bexar, Harris and Travis) permitted by a 2003 constitutional amendment to give conservation and reclamation districts the ability to issue bonds for the development and maintenance of parks and recreational facilities. Proposition 11 would bring El Paso County into the fold. Our view: For."
  • The Dallas Morning News Editorial Board: "RECOMMENDATION: Yes. In 2003, Texans voted to amend the state’s Constitution to allow certain conservation and reclamation districts across the state to fund parks and recreational space development and improvements with bonds backed by property taxes. This amendment would add El Paso County to a list of 11 other regions that are allowed to do this, including Bexar and Galveston counties and the Tarrant Regional Water District."
  • Fort Worth Star-Telegram Editorial Board: "El Paso County could have special districts to fund parks and recreation. It’s a pity they have to ask the rest of us for permission. Recommendation: For."
  • The Austin Chronicle Editorial Board: "Adding El Paso Parks: Yes. Currently, most large counties in Texas are allowed to issue bonds to create parks and improve those they already have. El Paso County is not one of these, however, which has hampered its ability to develop a network of recreational facilities. Prop 11 would allow it to join the other counties. We support El Paso in voting to invest more in their parks."
  • Austin American-Statesman Editorial Board: "Parks and recreational facilities enhance quality of life and benefit health and well-being. Bonds for these projects could only be authorized if voters of the district approve them, ensuring local control. Vote 'Yes.'"

Opposition

You can share campaign information or arguments, along with source links for this information, at editor@ballotpedia.org


Background

Senate Bill 938 (2023)

Senate Bill 938 (SB 938), the enabling legislation for the amendment, was also passed during the 2023 legislative session. It took effect when the amendment was approved. It passed in the Senate by a vote of 28-3 on April 11, 2023. It was passed in the House by a vote of 103-41 with two not voting on April 28. Gov. Greg Abbott (R) signed the bill on May 13.[5]

SB 938 amends the Texas Water Code to add El Paso County to the list of counties where conservation or reclamation districts located in all or part of the county may issue bonds to finance recreational facilities.[6]

Texas Proposition 7, El Paso County Parks and Recreational Provision Amendment (2011)

See also: Texas Proposition 7, El Paso County Parks and Recreational Provision Amendment (2011)

In 2011, the state legislature referred a similar measure as the 2023 amendment that would have authorized El Paso County to permit conservation and reclamation districts to issue bonds and levy taxes for the development and maintenance of parks and recreational facilities. The state Senate voted to put the amendment on the ballot by a vote of 30-1, and the state House vote was 144-0. It was defeated by a margin of 51.7% to 48.3%. The amendment was supported by the city of El Paso and the El Paso County Commissioners Court. It was opposed by We Texans, Empower Texans, and Texas Eagle Forum.[7][8][9][10]

Article 16, Texas Constitution

See also: Article 16, Texas Constitution

Article 16 of the Texas Constitution is titled General Provisions. The amendment proposes amending Section 59, which was added on August 21, 1917, and has been amended at least five times. The section governs conservation and reclamation districts and defines them as "governmental agencies and bodies politic and corporate with such powers of government and with the authority to exercise such rights, privileges and functions concerning the subject matter of this amendment as may be conferred by law."[11]

The last amendment in 2003 authorized the legislature to allow conservation and reclamation districts to use taxes to develop and finance certain parks and recreation facilities. The amendment also authorized the legislature to allow local elections for the issuance of bonds in the Tarrant Regional Water District or a conservation and reclamation district located in whole or in part in Bastrop, Bexar, Brazoria, Fort Bend, Galveston, Harris, Montgomery, Tarrant, Travis, Waller or Williamson Counties. It was approved with 56.4% of the vote.

Referred measures on the Texas ballot

See also: List of Texas ballot measures

In Texas, a total of 281 ballot measures appeared on statewide ballots between 1985 and 2022. Two hundred forty-eight ballot measures were approved, and 33 ballot measures were defeated.

Texas statewide ballot measures, 1985-2022
Total number Annual average Annual minimum Annual maximum Approved Defeated
# % # %
281
6.39
0
22
248
88.26
33
11.74

Texas ballot measures in odd-numbered years

Between 1995 and 2021, Texans decided on 175 statewide ballot measures appearing on odd-numbered year ballots. Voters approved 160 measures and defeated 15.


Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Texas Constitution

To put a legislatively referred constitutional amendment before voters, a two-thirds (66.67%) vote is required in both the Texas State Senate and the Texas House of Representatives.

This amendment was introduced as Senate Joint Resolution 32 on January 20, 2023. On April 11, 2023, the state Senate passed SJR 32 by a vote of 28-3. On April 25, the state House passed SJR 32 by a vote of 111-34 with five not voting.[1]

Vote in the Texas State Senate
April 11, 2023
Requirement: Two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 21  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total2830
Total percent90.3%9.7%0.0%
Democrat1200
Republican1630

Vote in the Texas House of Representatives
April 25, 2023
Requirement: Two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 100  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total111345
Total percent74.0%22.7%3.3%
Democrat6202
Republican49343

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Texas

Click "Show" to learn more about voter registration, identification requirements, and poll times in Texas.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Texas State Legislature, "SJR 32 Overview," accessed April 12, 2023
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Texas State Legislature, "SJR 32 Text," accessed April 12, 2023
  3. Texas State Legislature, "Article 16. Section 59." accessed May 19, 2023
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content
  5. Texas State Legislature, "Senate Bill 938," accessed May 19, 2023
  6. Texas State Legislature, "Senate Bill 938 Text," accessed May 19, 2023
  7. Texas House Research Organization: "Focus Report for Amendments Proposed in November 8, 2011 Election," July 20, 2011
  8. Empower Texans," "2011 Constitutional Amendments," October 7, 2011
  9. We Texans," "PROPOSITIONS VOTERS’ GUIDE: Just Say No," October 19, 2011
  10. Texas State Legislature, "Senate Joint Resolution 26," accessed May 10, 2023
  11. Texas Constitution and Statutes, "Texas Constitution," accessed March 30, 2014
  12. VoteTexas.gov, "Who, What, Where, When, How," accessed February 27, 2023
  13. Texas Secretary of State, “Request for Voter Registration Applications,” accessed February 27, 2023
  14. Texas Secretary of State, “Voter Registration,” accessed February 27, 2023
  15. Texas Constitution and Statutes, “Election Code,” accessed February 23, 2023
  16. The Texas Tribune, “Texas officials flag tens of thousands of voters for citizenship checks,” January 25, 2019
  17. The New York Times, “Federal Judge Halts ‘Ham-Handed’ Texas Voter Purge,” February 28, 2019
  18. The New York Times, “Texas Ends Review That Questioned Citizenship of Almost 100,000 Voters,” April 26, 2019
  19. Texas Secretary of State, “Secretary Whitley Announces Settlement In Litigation On Voter Registration List Maintenance Activity,” April 26, 2019
  20. 20.0 20.1 20.2 20.3 20.4 Texas Secretary of State, "Required Identification for Voting in Person," accessed February 27, 2023 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "tvid" defined multiple times with different content