Texas Proposition 10, Tax Exemption on Medical Equipment and Inventory Amendment (2023)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Texas Proposition 10
Flag of Texas.png
Election date
November 7, 2023
Topic
Taxes
Status
Approveda Approved
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature

Texas Proposition 10, the Tax Exemption on Medical Equipment and Inventory Amendment, was on the ballot in Texas as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 7, 2023.[1][2]The ballot measure was approved.

A "yes" vote supported amending the state constitution to authorize the state legislature to provide for an ad valorem tax exemption on equipment and inventory manufactured by medical or biomedical companies.

A "no" vote opposed amending the state constitution to authorize the state legislature to provide for an ad valorem tax exemption on equipment and inventory manufactured by medical or biomedical companies.


Election results

Texas Proposition 10

Result Votes Percentage

Approved Yes

1,370,569 55.00%
No 1,121,576 45.00%
Results are officially certified.
Source


Overview

What did the amendment do?

See also: Text of measure

The amendment authorized the state legislature to exempt from ad valorem taxation tangible personal property, including finished goods or goods used in the manufacturing process, possessed by a manufacturer of medical or biomedical products. The state legislature passed Senate Bill 2289, the enabling legislation, during the regular legislative session. SB 2289 defines medical and biomedical property as "tangible property that is (A) stored, used, or consumed in the manufacturing or processing of medical or biomedical products by a medical or biomedical manufacturer; or (B) intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of a condition or disease or in medical or biomedical research." This included devices, therapeutics, pharmaceuticals, personal protective equipment, tools, implants, instruments, and apparatuses. The law took effect on January 1, 2024.[2][3]

Who supported and opposed the amendment?

See also: Support and Opposition

Sen. Joan Huffman (R-17) authored the amendment. The Texas Medical Center, Texas Healthcare and Bioscience Institute, Greater Houston Partnership, and Biotechnology Innovation Organization registered in support of the amendment when it was considered by the Senate Finance Committee. No organizations registered in opposition to it.[4]

Text of measure

Ballot title

The ballot title was as follows:[2]

The constitutional amendment to authorize the legislature to exempt from ad valorem taxation equipment or inventory held by a manufacturer of medical or biomedical products to protect the Texas healthcare network and strengthen our medical supply chain.[5]

Constitutional changes

See also: Article 8, Texas Constitution

The measure added section 1 of Article 8 of the state constitution. The following underlined text was added:[2]

Sec. 1-x. The legislature by general law may exempt from ad valorem taxation the tangible personal property held by a manufacturer of medical or biomedical products as a finished good or used in the manufacturing or processing of medical or biomedical products.[5]

Readability score

See also: Ballot measure readability scores, 2023

Using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas, Ballotpedia scored the readability of the ballot title for this measure. Readability scores are designed to indicate the reading difficulty of text. The Flesch-Kincaid formulas account for the number of words, syllables, and sentences in a text; they do not account for the difficulty of the ideas in the text. The state legislature wrote the ballot language for this measure.

The FKGL for the ballot title is grade level 23, and the FRE is -7. The word count for the ballot title is 37.


Support

Supporters

Corporations

  • Biotechnology Innovation Organization
  • Greater Houston Partnership
  • Texas Healthcare and Bioscience Institute
  • Texas Medical Center

Arguments

You can share campaign information or arguments, along with source links for this information, at editor@ballotpedia.org

Opposition

Opponents

Organizations

  • Huffines Liberty Foundation
  • Texans for Fiscal Responsibility
  • Texas Eagle Forum
  • True Texas Project

Arguments

  • True Texas Project: "Exempting certain types of businesses from taxes puts a greater burden on the remaining taxpayers. Exemptions like this have governments picking winners and losers."


Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for Texas ballot measures

If you are aware of a committee registered to support or oppose this amendment, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Media editorials

See also: 2023 ballot measure media endorsements

Ballotpedia identified the following media editorial boards as taking positions on the proposition.

Ballotpedia lists the positions of media editorial boards that support or oppose ballot measures. This does not include opinion pieces from individuals or groups that do not represent the official position of a newspaper or media outlet. Ballotpedia includes editorials from newspapers and outlets based on circulation and readership, political coverage within a state, and length of publication. You can share media editorial board endorsements with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Support

  • Houston Chronicle Editorial Board: "Prop 10, Medical manufacturing tax break: For. While corporate tax breaks shift the tax burden onto others, we recommend this one in hopes that it will boost the Texas Medical Center and support an industry that will benefit Houston."
  • San Antonio Express-News Editorial Board: "Proposition 10: Texas is an outlier in the United States when it comes to how it levies property taxes on medical and biomedical companies. Proposition 10 would put Texas in line with much of the country by granting property tax exemptions to manufacturers of medical or biomedical production property tax exemptions for their medical equipment and inventory. This exemption could bolster the state’s medical supply chain and serve as an incentive for medical companies interested in relocating to Texas. Our view: For."
  • The Dallas Morning News Editorial Board: "RECOMMENDATION: Yes. Biotech is quickly becoming a big industry in Texas, and eliminating this tax on medical or biomedical equipment will keep that momentum going."
  • The Austin Chronicle Editorial Board: "Corporate Tax Break on Medical Devices: Yes. We're generally against tax breaks for corporations, but at least this one would go to manufacturers of medical devices and biomedical products. Let's just hope that the executives at those manufacturing companies will pass their tax savings on to hospitals and patients who need those devices."

Opposition

  • Fort Worth Star-Telegram Editorial Board: "If this amendment passes, the Legislature could exempt some medical product inventory from property taxes. As we hinted earlier, enough is enough on such tax carve-outs. Recommendation: Against."
  • Austin American-Statesman Editorial Board: "Much of the support for Proposition 10 is based on the idea that it will provide incentive for manufacturers to invest in Texas. That's an argument based on conjecture. In reality, in a state without an income tax, getting rid of property taxes on biomedical equipment and manufacturers will hurt local school districts and local government services. And why single out one industry for tax breaks if it puts a heavier burden on other businesses and residents to pay for local schools and services? Vote 'No.'"


Background

Senate Bill 2289 (2023)

The state legislature passed Senate Bill 2289, the enabling legislation, during the regular legislative session. SB 2289 defined medical and biomedical property as "tangible property that is (A) stored, used, or consumed in the manufacturing or processing of medical or biomedical products by a medical or biomedical manufacturer; or (B) intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of a condition or disease or in medical or biomedical research." This included devices, therapeutics, pharmaceuticals, personal protective equipment, tools, implants, instruments, and apparatuses. The law took effect on January 1, 2024.[3]

SB 2289 was passed in the Senate by a vote of 26-4 and in the House by a vote of 132-12 with five absent or not voting.[6]

The Senate Finance Committee estimated that the net impact of the bill through the biennium ending August 31, 2025, would be a negative impact of $28.8 million, increasing to a negative impact of $41.1 million in fiscal year 2028.[7]

Texas ad valorem property tax system

In 1968, Texas voters adopted Proposition 7, which provided for a gradual reduction in the state property tax and eventual abolishment after 1978, with exceptions for certain institutions of higher learning. In 1982, this exception for certain higher education institutions to levy state ad valorem property taxes was repealed with the passage of Proposition 1. As of 2023, only local taxing units, cities, counties, school districts, junior colleges, and special districts levy ad valorem taxes.

Referred measures on the Texas ballot

See also: List of Texas ballot measures

In Texas, a total of 281 ballot measures appeared on statewide ballots between 1985 and 2022. Two hundred forty-eight ballot measures were approved, and 33 ballot measures were defeated.

Texas statewide ballot measures, 1985-2022
Total number Annual average Annual minimum Annual maximum Approved Defeated
# % # %
281
6.39
0
22
248
88.26
33
11.74

Texas ballot measures in odd-numbered years

Between 1995 and 2021, Texans decided on 175 statewide ballot measures appearing on odd-numbered year ballots. Voters approved 160 measures and defeated 15.


Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the Texas Constitution

To put a legislatively referred constitutional amendment before voters, a two-thirds (66.67%) vote is required in both the Texas State Senate and the Texas House of Representatives.

This amendment was introduced as Senate Joint Resolution 87 on March 10, 2023. On April 13, 2023, the state Senate passed SJR 87 by a vote of 26-4 with one absent. On May 17, the state House passed SJR 87 by a vote of 125-10 with 14 not voting and one vacancy.[1]

Vote in the Texas State Senate
April 13, 2023
Requirement: Two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 21  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total2641
Total percent83.9%12.9%3.2%
Democrat1200
Republican1441

Vote in the Texas House of Representatives
May 17, 2023
Requirement: Two-thirds (66.67 percent) vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 100  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total1251014
Total percent83.9%6.7%9.4%
Democrat5707
Republican68107

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in Texas

Click "Show" to learn more about voter registration, identification requirements, and poll times in Texas.

See also

External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 Texas State Legislature, "SJR 87 Overview," accessed April 14, 2023
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Texas State Legislature, "SJR 87 Text," accessed April 14, 2023
  3. 3.0 3.1 Texas State Legislature, "Senate Bill 2289 Text," accessed June 1, 2023
  4. Texas State Legislature, "Witness list," accessed July 24, 2023
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content
  6. Texas State Legislature, "Senate Bill 2289 Overview," accessed June 1, 2023
  7. Texas State Legislature, "Fiscal Note," accessed September 11, 2023
  8. VoteTexas.gov, "Who, What, Where, When, How," accessed February 27, 2023
  9. Texas Secretary of State, “Request for Voter Registration Applications,” accessed February 27, 2023
  10. Texas Secretary of State, “Voter Registration,” accessed February 27, 2023
  11. Texas Constitution and Statutes, “Election Code,” accessed February 23, 2023
  12. The Texas Tribune, “Texas officials flag tens of thousands of voters for citizenship checks,” January 25, 2019
  13. The New York Times, “Federal Judge Halts ‘Ham-Handed’ Texas Voter Purge,” February 28, 2019
  14. The New York Times, “Texas Ends Review That Questioned Citizenship of Almost 100,000 Voters,” April 26, 2019
  15. Texas Secretary of State, “Secretary Whitley Announces Settlement In Litigation On Voter Registration List Maintenance Activity,” April 26, 2019
  16. 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 Texas Secretary of State, "Required Identification for Voting in Person," accessed February 27, 2023 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "tvid" defined multiple times with different content