North Dakota Constitutional Measure 2, Single-Subject Requirement for Initiatives and Require Constitutional Initiatives to be Passed Twice Amendment (2024)

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
North Dakota Single-Subject Requirement for Initiatives and Require Constitutional Initiatives to be Passed Twice Amendment
Flag of North Dakota.png
Election date
November 5, 2024
Topic
Direct democracy measures
Status
On the ballot
Type
Constitutional amendment
Origin
State legislature

The North Dakota Single-Subject Requirement for Initiatives and Require Constitutional Initiatives to be Passed Twice Amendment is on the ballot in North Dakota as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 5, 2024.

A "yes" vote supports this constitutional amendment to: 

  • establish a single-subject rule for initiatives (both statutory and constitutional), as determined by the secretary of state;
  • increase the signature requirement for constitutional amendment initiatives from 4% of the resident population to 5% of the resident population of the state; and
  • require proposed constitutional initiatives that have qualified for the ballot to be placed on the next primary election ballot, and, if approved, be placed on the next general election ballot, where it must be approved again to become effective.

A "no" vote opposes this constitutional amendment to adopt a single-subject rule for initiatives and make changes to the signature requirement and election process for citizen-initiated constitutional initiatives.


Overview

What would the amendment change?

See also: Text of measure

This amendment would make changes to the state's initiative process and requirements, including:

  • establishing a single-subject rule for initiatives (both statutory and constitutional), as determined by the North Dakota Secretary of State;
  • increasing the signature requirement for constitutional amendment initiatives from 4% of the resident population to 5% of the resident population of the state; and
  • requiring proposed constitutional initiatives that have qualified for the ballot to be placed on the next primary election ballot in June, and, if approved, be placed on the next general election ballot in November, where it must be approved again to become effective.[1]

What is a single-subject rule and what states have them?

See also: Single-subject rule

A single-subject rule is a state law that requires ballot initiatives to address a single subject, topic, or issue. There are 26 states that provide for at least one type of statewide citizen-initiated measure. Of those 26 states, 17 have single-subject rules. As of 2023, North Dakota was one of nine states that provide for at least one type of statewide citizen-initiated measure and that did not have a single-subject rule. The last ballot measure to provide for a single-subject rule for initiatives was Arizona Proposition 129, which was approved by a vote of 55% of voters in favor and 45% opposed.

Do other states require initiated amendments to be approved at two consecutive elections?

See also: State initiated amendment processes and Nevada double election requirement

Nevada is the only state where initiated constitutional amendments must be approved at two consecutive elections. This does not apply to legislatively referred constitutional amendments, which must be approved twice by the legislature (with a majority vote) but only once by the state’s voters. Since the double election requirement was created in 1962, there have been 15 citizen-initiated constitutional amendments that passed at the first election and appeared on the ballot again at the next election. Of the 15 measures, 13 were passed at their second elections (86.66%) and two failed (13.33%). Question 9 (1982) was rejected with 58.77% of the vote after it was approved with 70.31% of the vote in 1980. Question 3 (2018) was rejected with 67.05% of the vote after it was approved with 72.36% of the vote in 2016.

Text of measure

Constitutional changes

See also: Article III, North Dakota Constitution

The measure would amend sections 2, 3, 4, and 9 of Article III of the state constitution. The following underlined text would be added and struck-through text would be deleted:[2]

Note: Use your mouse to scroll over the below text to see the full text.


Section 2. An initiated measure may not embrace or be comprised of more than one subject, as determined by the secretary of state. A petition to initiate or to refer a measure must be presented to the secretary of state for approval as to form and compliance with the single subject requirement. A request for approval must be presented over the names and signatures of twenty-five or more qualified electors as sponsors, one of whom must be designated as chairman of the sponsoring committee. The secretary of state shall approve the petition for circulation if it is in proper form and contains the names and addresses of the sponsors and the full text of the measure.

The legislative assembly may provide by law for a procedure through which the legislative council may establish an appropriate method for determining the fiscal impact of an initiative measure and for making the information regarding the fiscal impact of the measure available to the public.

Section 3. The petition shall may be circulated only by qualified electors. They An individual circulating a petition shall swear thereon that the qualified electors who have signed the petition did so in their presence. Each qualified elector signing a petition also shall also write in the date of signing andhis post-office the qualified elector's complete residential address. No A law shall may not be enacted limiting the number of copies of a petition. The copies shall must become part of the original petition when filed.

Section 4. The petition may be submitted to the secretary of state if signed by qualified electors equal in number to two percent of the resident population of the state at the last federal decennial census.

Section 9. A constitutional amendment may be proposed by initiative petition. The petition may be circulated only by qualified electors. The proposed amendment may not embrace or be comprised of more than one subject, as determined by the secretary of state, and the secretary of state may not approve the initiative petition for circulation if the proposed amendment comprises more than one subject. If signed by qualified electors equal in number to four five percent of the resident population of the state at the last federal decennial census, the petition may be submitted to the secretary of state. If the secretary of state finds the petition is valid, the secretary of state shall place the measure on the ballot at the next primary election. If the majority of the votes cast on the measure are affirmative in the primary election, the measure must be placed on the ballot at the general election immediately following the primary election for final consideration. If a majority of votes cast for a proposed constitutional amendment are affirmative in the general election, the measure is deemed enacted. If the measure fails to receive the required number of votes to enact the measure at either the primary election or the general election, the measure is deemed failed. All other provisions relating to initiative measures apply hereto to initiative measures for constitutional amendments. [3]

Support

Supporters

Officials


Ballotpedia has not located a campaign in support of the ballot measure. You can share campaign information or arguments, along with source links for this information, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Opposition

Arguments

  • Democracy Docket: "The proposed amendment is part of a trend of Republican-controlled states moving to restrict the ballot measure process in recent years. Voters in many states have used the process to enact policies over the objections of Republican legislators, such as protections for reproductive freedoms, minimum wage increases and Medicaid expansion."


Ballotpedia has not located a campaign in opposition to the ballot measure. You can share campaign information or arguments, along with source links for this information, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.

Campaign finance

See also: Campaign finance requirements for North Dakota ballot measures

If you are aware of a committee registered to support or oppose this measure, please email editor@ballotpedia.org.

Cash Contributions In-Kind Contributions Total Contributions Cash Expenditures Total Expenditures
Support $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Oppose $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Polls

See also: Ballotpedia's approach to covering polls and 2024 ballot measure polls
Are you aware of a poll on this ballot measure that should be included below? You can share ballot measure polls, along with source links, with us at editor@ballotpedia.org.
North Dakota Constitutional Measure 2, Single-Subject Requirement for Initiatives and Require Constitutional Initiatives to be Passed Twice Amendment (2024)
Poll
Dates
Sample size
Margin of error
Support
Oppose
Undecided
North Dakota News Cooperative, WPA Intelligence 11/5/2023-11/7/2023 517 LV ± 4.3% 36% 48% 18%
Question: "Do you support or oppose changing the North Dakota Constitution to require constitutional amendments to pass twice- in consecutive elections- to become law?"
Note: LV is likely voters, RV is registered voters, and EV is eligible voters.

Background

Single-subject rule

See also: Single-subject rule

The single-subject rule is a state law that requires ballot initiatives to address a single subject, topic, or issue. There are 26 states that provide for at least one type of statewide citizen-initiated measure. Of those 26 states, 17 have single-subject rules.

The following map provides a visual illustration of which states have an initiative and referendum process and a single-subject rule for citizen-initiated measures.


To read more about states with single-subject requirements, click here.

Recent single-subject rule ballot measures

See also: Direct democracy ballot measures

2022

See also: Arizona Proposition 129, Single-Subject Requirement for Ballot Initiatives Amendment (2022)

In 2022, voters in Arizona approved Proposition 129, which required citizen-initiated ballot measures to embrace a single subject. Prior to Proposition 129, Arizona did not have a single-subject rule for ballot initiatives. The Arizona State Legislature referred Proposition 129 to the ballot.

2018

See also: South Dakota Constitutional Amendment Z and Changes in 2018 to laws governing ballot measures

South Dakota voters approved Amendment Z in November 2018. Amendment Z enacted a single-subject rule for constitutional amendments—including both initiated constitutional amendments and legislatively referred constitutional amendments. It did not enact a single-subject rule for initiated state statutes. Prior to November 2018, South Dakota did not feature a single-subject rule for any type of statewide ballot measure. Amendment Z was referred to the ballot by the legislature, which voted on it largely along partisan lines, with all but five Republican legislators voting in favor of it and all but two Democratic legislators voting against it. The state legislature also passed a bill in 2018—House Bill 1007—that enacted a single-subject rule for initiated state statutes, thus applying a single-subject rule to all citizen initiatives in the state.

State processes for initiated constitutional amendments

An initiated constitutional amendment is a citizen-initiated ballot measure that amends a state's constitution. There are 18 states that allow citizens to initiate constitutional amendments. Proponents of a ballot initiative collect petition signatures from a certain minimum number of registered voters in a state.

The 18 states that provide for initiated constitutional amendments are:

An initiated constitutional amendment (ICA) can be direct or indirect. Of the 18 states that provide for initiated constitutional amendments, these measures are direct in 16 states and indirect in two states - Massachusetts and Mississippi. While a direct initiative goes to voters, an indirect initiative goes to the state legislature, which can take various actions on the proposal, before voters. You can read more about indirect initiated constitutional amendments here.

Note on Mississippi:

Mississippi has an initiated constitutional amendment process, including a signature distribution requirement based on five congressional districts. However, the requirements cannot be met, according to the Mississippi Supreme Court, because the state has four congressional districts following reapportionment in 2001.[4]

Nevada double-election requirement

Nevada is the only state where initiated constitutional amendments must be approved at two consecutive elections. This does not apply to legislatively referred constitutional amendments, which must be approved twice by the legislature (with a majority vote) but only once by the state’s voters. Since the double election requirement was created in 1962, there have been 15 citizen-initiated constitutional amendments that passed at the first election and appeared on the ballot again at the next election. Of the 15 measures, 13 were passed at their second elections (86.66%) and two failed (13.33%). Question 9 (1982) was rejected with 58.77% of the vote after it was approved with 70.31% of the vote in 1980. Question 3 (2018) was rejected with 67.05% of the vote after it was approved with 72.36% of the vote in 2016.

Constitutional amendments in North Dakota

Referred amendments

From 1996 through 2022, the state legislature referred 37 constitutional amendments to the ballot. Voters approved 24 and rejected 13 of the referred amendments. All of the amendments were referred to the ballot during even-numbered election years. The average number of amendments appearing on the ballot was about three. The approval rate of referred amendments at the ballot box was 64.86% from 1996 through 2022. The rejection rate was 35.14%. The following table contains data for referred amendments during even-numbered election years from 1996 through 2022:

Legislatively-referred constitutional amendments, 1996-2022
Total number Approved Percent approved Defeated Percent defeated Even-year average Even-year median Even-year minimum Even-year maximum
37 24 64.86% 13 35.14% 3 2 0 8

Initiated amendments

From 1996 through 2022, 17 initiated constitutional amendments appeared on the ballot. Voters approved 10 (58.82%) and rejected 7 (41.18%) of the proposed amendments. All of the amendments were on the ballot during even-numbered election years. The average number of amendments appearing on the ballot was about one. The following table contains data for initiated constitutional amendments during even-numbered election years from 1996 through 2022:

Citizen initiated constitutional amendments, 1996-2022
Total number Approved Percent approved Defeated Percent defeated Even-year average Even-year median Even-year minimum Even-year maximum
17 10 58.82% 7 41.18% 1.2 1 0 5

Signature requirements for North Dakota initiatives

See also: Signature requirements for ballot measures in North Dakota

Since North Dakota does not have a voter registration system, the number of signatures required is tied to the population reported by the last decennial census. For statutes and veto referendums, the number of signatures required is 2% of the population. For constitutional amendments, it is 4% of the population.

The chart below shows election years and the signature requirement for initiatives designed to appear on the ballot in that year, with decennial census years bolded. In 2021, the population of North Dakota was reported as 779,100.[5][6] Signature requirements will be recalculated after the 2030 decennial census and will trigger changes in the number of required signatures beginning in 2032.

Year Constitutional amendment Initiated statute Veto referendum
2022 31,164 15,582 15,582
2020 26,904 13,452 13,452
2018 26,904 13,452 13,452
2016 26,904 13,452 13,452
2014 26,904 13,452 13,452
2012 26,904 13,452 13,452
2010 25,688 12,844 12,844
2008 25,688 12,844 12,844

Changes in the number of required signatures

Path to the ballot

See also: Amending the North Dakota Constitution

To put a legislatively referred constitutional amendment before voters, a simple majority vote is required in both the North Dakota State Senate and the North Dakota House of Representatives.

This amendment was introduced as Senate Concurrent Resolution 4013 on January 23, 2023. The Senate approved the amendment in a vote of 44-3 on February 21, 2023. The House passed an amended version of the bill on March 23 in a vote of 73-18 and returned the bill to the Senate for concurrence. The Senate concurred with the House's amendments on April 10, 2023, by a voice vote.[1]

Vote in the North Dakota State Senate
February 21, 2023
Requirement: Simple majority vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 24  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total4430
Total percent93.62%6.38%0.0%
Democrat220
Republican4210

Vote in the North Dakota House of Representatives
March 23, 2023
Requirement: Simple majority vote of all members in each chamber
Number of yes votes required: 48  Approveda
YesNoNot voting
Total73183
Total percent78.72%19.15%3.19%
Democrat1101
Republican7282

How to cast a vote

See also: Voting in North Dakota

Click "Show" to learn more about voter registration, identification requirements, and poll times in North Dakota.

See also

  • Ballot measure lawsuits
  • Ballot measure readability
  • Ballot measure polls

External links

Footnotes