California Proposition 13, Tax Limitations Initiative (June 1978)
| California Proposition 13 | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Election date June 6, 1978 | |
| Topic Taxes | |
Status Approved | |
| Type Constitutional amendment | Origin Citizens |
California Proposition 13 was on the ballot as an initiated constitutional amendment in California on June 6, 1978. It was approved.
A "yes" vote supported this constitutional amendment to: * require that properties be taxed at no more than 1 percent of their full cash value shown on the 1975-1976 assessment rolls and limit annual increases of assessed (taxable) value to the inflation rate or 2 percent, whichever was less. * upon the transfer of properties, allow them to be reassessed at one percent of their sale price and reset the limit on annual increases of assessed value.
* prohibit the state legislature from enacting new taxes on the value or sale of properties.
* require a two-thirds vote of the state legislature to increase non-property taxes.
* require local governments to refer special taxes to the ballot and require a two-thirds vote of electors.
* make the state government responsible for distributing property tax revenue among local governments. |
A "no" vote opposed this constitutional amendment to require that properties be taxed at no more than 1 percent of their full cash value shown on the 1975-1976 assessment rolls and limit annual increases of assessed (taxable) value to the inflation rate or 2 percent, whichever was less, and make other changes to tax-related provisions of the California Constitution. |
Election results
|
California Proposition 13 |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Votes | Percentage | ||
|
|
4,280,689 | 64.79% | ||
| No | 2,326,167 | 35.21% | ||
Overview
The ballot initiative was designed to:[1][2]
- require that properties be taxed at no more than 1 percent of their full cash value shown on the 1975-1976 assessment rolls and limit annual increases of assessed (taxable) value to the inflation rate or 2 percent, whichever was less.
- upon the transfer of properties, allow them to be reassessed at one percent of their sale price and reset the limit on annual increases of assessed value.
- prohibit the state legislature from enacting new taxes on the value or sale of properties.
- require a two-thirds vote of the state legislature to increase non-property taxes.
- require local governments to refer special taxes to the ballot and require a two-thirds vote of electors.
- make the state government responsible for distributing property tax revenue among local governments.
Howard Jarvis, who founded the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, developed Proposition 13. He also worked with Paul Gann on the initiative.[3][4]
Text of measure
Ballot title
The ballot title for Proposition 13 was as follows:
| “ | Tax Limitation—Initiative Constitutional Amendment. | ” |
Ballot summary
The ballot summary for this measure was:
| “ | Limits ad valorem taxes on real property to 1% of value except to pay indebtedness previously approved by voters. Establishes 1975-76 assessed valuation base for property tax purposes. Limits annual increases in value. Provides for reassessment after sale, transfer, or construction. Requires 2/3 vote of Legislature to enact any change in state taxes designed to increase revenues. Prohibits imposition by state of new ad valorem, sales, or transaction taxes on real property. Authorizes imposition of special taxes by local government (except on real property) by 2/3 vote of qualified electors. | ” |
Full Text
The full text of this measure is available here.
Fiscal note
The fiscal impact statement was as follows:[1]
| “ | Commencing with fiscal year beginning July 1, 1978, would result in annual losses of local government property tax revenues (approximately $7 billion in 1978-79 fiscal year), reduction in annual state costs (approximately $600 million in 1978-79 fiscal year), and restriction on future ability of local governments to finance capital construction by sale of general obligation bonds.[5] | ” |
Constitutional changes
- See also: Article XIII A
The measure added Article XIII A to the California Constitution. The following text was added:[1]
Note: Use your mouse to scroll over the below text to see the full text.
Section 1. (a) The maximum amount of any ad valorem tax on real property shall not exceed one percent (1%) of the full cash value of such property. The one percent (1%) tax to be collected by the counties and apportioned according to law to the districts within the counties. (b) The limitation provided for in subdivision (a) shall not apply to ad valorem taxes or special assessments to pay the interest and redemption charges on any indebtedness approved by the voters prior to the time this section becomes effective. Section 2. (a) The full cash value means the County Assessors valuation of real property as shown on the 1975-76 tax bill under “full cash value,” or thereafter, the appraised value of real property when purchased, newly constructed, or a change in ownership has occurred after the 1975 assessment. All real property not already assessed up to the 1975-76 tax levels may be reassessed to reflect that valuation. (b) The fair market value base may reflect from year to year the inflationary rate not to exceed two percent (2%) for any given year or reduction as shown in the consumer price index or comparable data for the area under taxing jurisdiction. Section 3. From and after the effective date of this article, any changes in State taxes enacted for the purpose of increasing revenues collected pursuant thereto whether by increased rates or changes in methods of computation must be imposed by an Act passed by not less than two-thirds of all members elected to each of the two houses of the Legislature, except that no new ad valorem taxes on real property, or sales or transaction taxes on the sales of real property may be imposed. Section 4. Cities, Counties and special districts, by a two-thirds vote of the qualified electors of such district, may impose special taxes on such district, except ad valorem taxes on real property or a transaction tax or sales tax on the sale of real property within such City, County or special district. Section 5. This article shall take effect for the tax year beginning on July 1 following the passage of this Amendment, except Section 3 which shall become effective upon the passage of this article. Section 6. If any section, part, clause, or phrase hereof is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, the remaining sections shall not be affected but will remain in full force and effect.[5] |
Background
Affect on state politics in California
Proposition 13 was the beginning of a period in state politics that has been referred to as the tax revolt.[6][7][8] Joel Fox, editor of Fox & Hounds, said Proposition 13 was the "Holy Grail of the tax revolt."[9] The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association described Proposition 13 as "a California tax cut with a national identity," stating, "The tax cut message rolled across the country after Proposition 13 passed. Some say it was the spark that ignited a conflagration, which culminated in the election of Ronald Reagan to the presidency."[10]
In 2014, Gov. Jerry Brown stated that he would not seek to change Proposition 13, saying that the initiative was "sacred doctrine that should never be questioned." Gov. Brown, who was also governor in 1978, said that he should have funded a campaign for an alternative to Proposition 13.[11] In 2017, Jennifer Ito, a research director at the University of Southern California, said, "It’s been an issue that no politician wants to touch. Until recently."[12] In October 2018, Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association president Jon Coupal said, "This is not the California of 1978. It has become more progressive." However, he added, Proposition 13 "[is] withstanding the test of time, no matter what anyone says."[13]
Path to the ballot
In California, the number of signatures required for an initiated constitutional amendment is equal to 8 percent of the votes cast in the preceding gubernatorial election. To get an initiated constitutional amendment on the ballot in 1978, proponents needed to collect 449,846 valid signatures.[14]
See also
External links
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 UC-Hastings, "Voter Information Guide for 1978, Primary," accessed December 21, 2017
- ↑ California Tax Data, "What is Proposition 13?" accessed December 21, 2017
- ↑ Time, "How California's Fiscal Woes Began: A Crisis 30 Years in the Making," July 1, 2009
- ↑ New York Times, "The California Ballot Measure That Inspired a Tax Revolt," October 16, 2016
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source. Cite error: Invalid
<ref>tag; name "quotedisclaimer" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ Hoover Institute, "The Tax Revolt Turns 20," July 1, 1998
- ↑ Wall Street Journal, "The Terms of Surrender in California’s Tax Revolt," October 26, 2016
- ↑ Reuters, "California's anti-tax crusaders talk revolt," April 7, 2009
- ↑ Los Angeles Times, "Can Proposition 13 survive California's new appetite for taxes?" November 17, 2016
- ↑ Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, "Proposition 13: A Look Back," accessed December 3, 2018
- ↑ Los Angeles Times, "An experienced Jerry Brown vows to build on what he's already done," October 19, 2018
- ↑ International Business Times, "Activists Vow To Reform Anti-Tax Prop. 13 — The ‘Third Rail’ Of California Politics," October 5, 2017
- ↑ Los Angeles Times, "Proposition 13 has strictly limited property tax increases since 1978. Voters could get a chance to change that," October 17, 2018
- ↑ The Rose Institute of State and Local Government, “A Study of California Initiatives: 1976-1986,” Spring 1988
 |
State of California Sacramento (capital) |
|---|---|
| Elections |
What's on my ballot? | Elections in 2024 | How to vote | How to run for office | Ballot measures |
| Government |
Who represents me? | U.S. President | U.S. Congress | Federal courts | State executives | State legislature | State and local courts | Counties | Cities | School districts | Public policy |
